Key result
3D TEE assesses mitral valve area and anatomy more accurately than 2D TEE in RHD.
Why the study?
Careful echocardiographic selection of patients with rheumatic heart disease is essential to assess mitral valve anatomy and ensure the safety, success, and long-term outcomes of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty.
How does echocardiography, particularly 3D TEE, assist in the assessment of rheumatic heart disease and patient selection for percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty?
How does echocardiography, particularly 3D TEE, assist in the assessment of rheumatic heart disease and patient selection for percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty?
3D transesophageal echocardiography provides superior accuracy over 2D imaging for assessing mitral valve anatomy and determining the feasibility of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty in rheumatic heart disease.
May aid mitral valve assessment and valvuloplasty selection in rheumatic disease; extends 2D data but remains hypothesis-generating.
Echocardiography is an important diagnostic imaging modality in recognizing rheumatic heart disease, a chronic sequelae of acute rheumatic fever. Left-sided heart valves, especially the mitral valve is typically affected, with stenosis or regurgitation as a consequence. Although assessment of valve area by 2D planimetry is the reference method for mitral stenosis severity, 3D planimetry provides more accurate measurement and diagnostic value. Careful selection of patients in terms of echocardiographic criteria is essential to ensure safety and success of the intervention and better long-term outcomes. Several echocardiographic scores based upon mitral valve mobility, thickening, calcification, and subvalvular thickening are developed to assess mitral valve anatomy and the feasibility of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy. 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides detailed information of the mitral anatomy (commissural fusions, and subvalvular apparatus) before intervention. In addition, 3D TEE planimetry provides a more accurate measurement of the valve area compared with 2D echocardiography. Generally, huge annular calcification and lack of commissural fusion are unfavorable echocardiographic markers that increase the risk of complications and preclude the feasibility of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. More contemporary prospective echocardiography research studies on patients with RHD from low- and middle-income countries are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2023) conducted a review in Rheumatic heart disease. Echocardiography was evaluated. 3D transesophageal echocardiography provides more accurate measurement of the mitral valve area and detailed anatomical information compared with 2D echocardiography in rheumatic heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: