Systematic review investigates the impact of Industry 5.0 on supply chain sustainability and workforce, highlighting implications for adaptation.
Orientation: A systematic literature review emphasises the importance of building a resilient and forward-looking industrial sector that can adapt to the evolving demands of Industry 5.0 as it transitions from Industry 4.0. The strategic recommendations from this review underscore the significance of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) and effective talent management. Research purpose: This study aims to investigate how the transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 impacts SSCM and talent management, based on a systematic review and synthesis of existing literature. Motivation for the study: The significance of the study lies in understanding the profound implications of Industry 5.0 on supply chain sustainability and workforce development, particularly in the context of integrating human-centric and sustainable practices with advanced digital technologies. Research approach/design and method: The study employs the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to conduct a comprehensive systematic review. It synthesises existing literature focussing on the technological advancements, human resource challenges and sustainable practices adopted by industries transitioning from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0. Main findings: The study reveals that industries are increasingly integrating advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics and blockchain to improve supply chain efficiency and sustainability. Significant emphasis is placed on reskilling and upskilling the workforce to align with the demands of new technologies and human-centric industrial processes. Practical/managerial implications: The findings highlight the key role of policymakers, industry leaders, and educational institutions in driving the successful adaptation to Industry 5.0. Policymakers must prioritise funding and supportive regulations, while industry leaders need to embrace ongoing upskilling initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuels et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: