Key result
A new algorithm using automatic scanning of sensing threshold and cycle length detected atrial fibrillation with 90% sensitivity and 96% specificity.
Why the study?
Does a new algorithm using automatic scanning of sensing threshold and cycle length accurately detect atrial fibrillation in implantable devices?
Does a new algorithm using automatic scanning of sensing threshold and cycle length accurately detect atrial fibrillation in implantable devices?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 90%, Specificity 96%
A novel, computationally efficient algorithm using threshold scanning demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for detecting atrial fibrillation, making it suitable for implantable devices.
May enable AF detection in implantable devices; leaves open need for prospective validation before adoption.
A new approach is presented for computationally efficient detection of atrial fibrillation in which atrial rate is measured as the pacemaker sensing and cycle length threshold are independently varied. This extends the "threshold scanning" rate curve into a two dimensional integer function. A similarity metric is used to compare the shape of this function to one typical of atrial fibrillation. The algorithm correctly identified 26 of 29 episodes of atrial fibrillation and incorrectly identified as atrial fibrillation 3 of 83 episodes of other rhythms, for a sensitivity of 90% and specificity 96%. The integer character of the discriminating function as well as the simplicity of the implementation make this algorithm suitable for implantable devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milisavjevic et al. (2002) studied Atrial fibrillation. Algorithm using automatic scanning of sensing threshold and cycle length was evaluated on Detection of atrial fibrillation (Sensitivity 90%, Specificity 96%). A new algorithm using automatic scanning of sensing threshold and cycle length detected atrial fibrillation with 90% sensitivity and 96% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: