Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: G12C-mutated NSCLC beyond the traditional registrational trial setting are presented. Methods: Patients were enrolled in 90 centers globally. Baseline characteristics and safety data for Study-436 and Study-442 and efficacy data for Study-436 were estimated. All data were summarized descriptively. Results: A total of 268 patients (n = 150 [Study-436] and n = 118 [Study-442]) received oral sotorasib (960 mg daily). At baseline, 21.3% and 31.0% of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 and a history of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, respectively.Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 64.9% of patients; diarrhea (31.3%) was the most common. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar between patients with ECOG PS 0 to 1 (67.8%) and PS 2 (54.4%) and those with (69.9%) and without (62.7%) a history of CNS metastases. The median real-world progression-free survival and overall survival was 6.3 and 9.5 months, respectively. The median real-world progression-free survival was numerically similar in patients with ECOG PS 0 to 1 versus PS 2 (6.5 versus 5.6 mo) and in patients with versus without a history of CNS metastases (5.7 versus 6.5 mo); median overall survival followed similar trends. Improvement from ECOG PS 2 to ECOG PS 0 to 1 was observed by the end of first cycle of treatment (57.9%). Conclusions: Safety and efficacy outcomes of sotorasib in this study were not affected with ECOG PS 2 and the history of CNS metastases and were consistent with those reported in key clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novello et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: