Why the study?
Coronary angiography alone is not sensitive enough to identify patients with a low cardiac event rate after regular coronary balloon angioplasty. Whether combining optimal angiographic results with pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) could predict clinical outcome was investigated.
Does the combination of optimal angiographic (diameter stenosis <=35%) and functional (FFR >=0.90) results improve event-free survival in patients with single-vessel disease after balloon angioplasty?
Cohort (n=60)
Does the combination of optimal angiographic (diameter stenosis <=35%) and functional (FFR >=0.90) results improve event-free survival in patients with single-vessel disease after balloon angioplasty?
The combination of optimal angiographic (diameter stenosis <=35%) and functional (FFR >=0.90) results after balloon angioplasty predicts excellent clinical outcomes up to 2 years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimal results after balloon angioplasty were associated with higher event-free survival; hypothesis-generating for randomized validation of combined criteria.
BACKGROUND: After regular coronary balloon angioplasty, it would be helpful to identify those patients who have a low cardiac event rate. Coronary angiography alone is not sensitive enough for that purpose, but it has been suggested that the combination of optimal angiographic and optimal functional results indicates a low restenosis chance. Pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index of the functional severity of the residual epicardial lesion and could be useful for that purpose. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 60 consecutive patients with single-vessel disease, balloon angioplasty was performed by use of a pressure instead of a regular guide wire. Both quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and measurement of FFR were performed 15 minutes after the procedure. A successful angioplasty result, defined as a residual diameter stenosis (DS) <50%, was achieved in 58 patients. In these patients, DS and FFR, measured 15 minutes after PTCA, were analyzed in relation to clinical outcome. In those 26 patients with both optimal angiographic (residual DS by QCA </=35%) and optimal functional (FFR >/=0.90) results, event-free survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 92+/-5%, 92+/-5%, and 88+/-6%, respectively, versus 72+/-8%, 69+/-8%, and 59+/-9%, respectively, in the remaining 32 patients in whom the angiographic or functional result or both were suboptimal (P=0.047, P=0.028, and P=0.014, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a residual DS </=35% and FFR >/=0.90, clinical outcome up to 2 years is excellent. Therefore, there is a complementary value of coronary angiography and coronary pressure measurement in the evaluation of PTCA result.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bech et al. (1999) conducted a cohort in Single-vessel coronary artery disease undergoing balloon angioplasty (n=60). Optimal angiographic (residual diameter stenosis <=35%) and functional (FFR >=0.90) result 15 minutes post-PTCA vs. Suboptimal angiographic (residual DS >35%) or functional (FFR <0.90) result or both was evaluated on Event-free survival at 24 months (p=0.014).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: