Key result
TAVI is linked to ~1.8-point higher LV longitudinal forces apex-base versus baseline in severe AS.
Why the study?
Echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamic forces holds potential to predict early improvement in LV function after TAVI, but needs evaluation.
Does TAVI acutely improve echocardiographic hemodynamic forces in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=25)
No
Does TAVI acutely improve echocardiographic hemodynamic forces in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamic forces demonstrates acute improvement in intraventricular fluid dynamics following TAVI, even before LVEF or strain changes become apparent.
TAVI was associated with acute LV force improvement on echo; hypothesis-generating for hemodynamic monitoring before LVEF or strain changes.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the established first-line treatment for patient with severe aortic stenosis not suitable for surgery. Echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamic forces (HDFs) is a growing field, holding the potential to early predict improvement in LV function. A prospective observational study was conducted. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and after TAVI. HDFs were analyzed along with traditional left ventricular (LV) function parameters. Twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled: mean age 83 ± 5 years, 74.5% male, mean LV Ejection Fraction (LVEF) at baseline 57 ± 8%. Post-TAVI echocardiographic evaluation was performed 2.4 ± 1.06 days after the procedure. HDF amplitude parameters improved significantly after the procedure: LV Longitudinal Forces (LF) apex-base [mean difference (MD) 1.79%; 95% CI 1.07–2.5; p-value < 0.001]; LV systolic LF apex-base (MD 2.6%; 95% CI 1.57–3.7; p-value < 0.001); LV impulse (LVim) apex-base (MD 2.9%; 95% CI 1.48–4.3; p-value < 0.001). Similarly, HDFs orientation parameters improved: LVLF angle (MD 1.5°; 95% CI 0.07–2.9; p-value = 0.041); LVim angle (MD 2.16°; 95% CI 0.76–3.56; p-value = 0.004). Conversely, global longitudinal strain and LVEF did not show any significant difference before and after the procedure. Echocardiographic analysis of HDFs could help differentiate patients with LV function recovery after TAVI from patients with persistent hemodynamic dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vairo et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=25). Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) vs. Pre-procedure baseline was evaluated on LV Longitudinal Forces (LF) apex-base (MD 1.79%, 95% CI 1.07-2.5, p=<0.001). TAVI significantly improved LV longitudinal forces apex-base (MD 1.79%) and systolic components of hemodynamic forces compared to baseline in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: