Key result
Systematic review assesses GLS, MW, and HDF for predicting reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes post-TAVI.
Why the study?
To systematically review advanced echocardiographic parameters, including GLS, MW, and HDF, as predictors of reverse remodeling and their association with outcomes in patients with AS undergoing TAVI.
Do advanced echocardiographic parameters (GLS, MW, HDF) predict reverse remodeling and outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?
Systematic Review
Do advanced echocardiographic parameters (GLS, MW, HDF) predict reverse remodeling and outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?
Advanced echocardiographic parameters such as global longitudinal strain, myocardial work, and hemodynamic forces may offer prognostic value for reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angotti et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Severe aortic stenosis. Advanced echocardiographic analysis (GLS, MW, HDF) was evaluated on Reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes. This systematic review aims to evaluate advanced echocardiographic parameters (GLS, MW, and HDF) as predictors of reverse remodeling and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: