Key result
The TBATS model produced lower error rates in both 12-step and 24-step ahead forecasting of HFMD morbidity compared to the SARIMA model.
Why the study?
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease has high morbidity, complex seasonality, and recurring risk in China, making accurate trend forecasting critical for informing vaccine and targeted interventions.
Does the TBATS model improve forecasting accuracy of HFMD morbidity in China compared to the SARIMA model?
Population
HFMD morbidity data in China from January 2009 to December 2019
Comparison
TBATS model vs SARIMA model
Design
Time series analysis and forecasting study
Authors
Loading...
May aid HFMD surveillance planning; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
Does the TBATS model improve forecasting accuracy of HFMD morbidity in China compared to the SARIMA model?
The TBATS model outperforms the SARIMA model in forecasting HFMD incidence in China, providing a useful tool for disease prevention and control.
Yu et al. (2021) studied Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD). TBATS model vs. SARIMA model was evaluated on Forecasting error rates for 12-step and 24-step ahead forecasting. The TBATS model produced lower error rates in both 12-step and 24-step ahead forecasting of HFMD morbidity compared to the SARIMA model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: