Key result
Inferior vena cava filters added to anticoagulation did not significantly reduce recurrent pulmonary embolism at 3 months compared to anticoagulation alone in 863 patients with deep vein thrombosis.
Why the study?
Does inferior vena cava filter placement in addition to anticoagulation prevent recurrent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep vein thrombosis?
Meta-Analysis (n=863)
Does inferior vena cava filter placement in addition to anticoagulation prevent recurrent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep vein thrombosis?
In patients with deep vein thrombosis, the addition of an inferior vena cava filter to anticoagulation does not reduce the short-term incidence of recurrent pulmonary embolism.
Supports avoiding routine IVC filter addition in anticoagulated DVT; reinforces anticoagulation alone for PE prevention.
Objectives To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of inferior vena cava filters in patients with deep vein thrombosis for preventing pulmonary embolism. Method Relevant randomized controlled trials of inferior vena cava filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism were identified by searching electronic databases updated in February 2016. Relative risks of recurrent pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, and mortality at three months were analyzed. Results Three published randomized controlled trials were included involving a total of 863 deep vein thrombosis patients. No significant differences were detected with inferior vena cava filters placement with regard to the incidence of recurrent pulmonary embolism or fatal pulmonary embolism. There were also no significant differences in the incidence of recurrent deep vein thrombosis or mortality with inferior vena cava filters placement at three months. Conclusions Inferior vena cava filter in addition to anticoagulation was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of recurrent pulmonary embolism as compared with anticoagulation alone in patients with deep vein thrombosis in the short term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in deep vein thrombosis (n=863). Inferior vena cava filters in addition to anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation alone was evaluated on recurrent pulmonary embolism. Inferior vena cava filters added to anticoagulation did not significantly reduce recurrent pulmonary embolism at 3 months compared to anticoagulation alone in 863 patients with deep vein thrombosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: