Key result
Severe aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF is linked to ~3.5-point lower global longitudinal strain.
Why the study?
Identifying early subclinical markers of LV dysfunction in significant aortic stenosis is critical to support earlier intervention, but the impact of severe AS on myocardial deformation and rotational mechanics by 2D and 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography needed evaluation.
Does severe aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF alter myocardial deformation and rotational mechanics compared to normal subjects?
Observational (n=168)
No
Does severe aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF alter myocardial deformation and rotational mechanics compared to normal subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: -16.2% vs -19.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Speckle-tracking echocardiography detects subclinical myocardial systolic dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis despite a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Strain imaging may detect subclinical dysfunction in severe AS with preserved LVEF; leaves open its value for risk stratification or timing of intervention.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) causes left ventricular (LV) pressure overload, leading to adverse LV remodeling and dysfunction. Identifying early subclinical markers of LV dysfunction in patients with significant AS is critical as this could provide support for earlier intervention, which may result in improved long-term outcomes. We therefore examined the impact of severe AS and its consequent increase in LV afterload on myocardial deformation and rotational mechanics by 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) speckle-tracking echocardiography. METHODS: We prospectively measured various strain parameters in 168 patients (42% female, mean age 72 ± 12 years) with severe AS and LV ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%, and compared them to normal values found in literature. 2D and 3D images were analyzed for global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS), basal rotation, apical rotation, and peak systolic twist. We further assessed the degree of concordance between 2D and 3D strain, and examined their association with measures of LV preload and afterload. RESULTS: Patients with severe AS exhibited significantly lower GLS and GRS but higher GCS, apical rotation, and twist by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared with published normal values (P = 0.003 for 3D twist, P < 0.001 for all others). Agreement between 2D- and 3D-GLS by concordance correlation coefficient was 0.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.57). GLS was correlated with valvulo-arterial impedance, a measure of LV afterload (r = 0.34, p < 0.001 and r = 0.23, p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with severe AS demonstrated lower-than-normal GLS and GRS but appear to compensate with higher-than-normal GCS, apical rotation, and twist in order to maintain a preserved LVEF. GLS showed a modest correlation with valvulo-arterial impedance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bi et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF (n=168). Severe aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF vs. Published normal healthy subjects was evaluated on 2D Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) (p=<0.001). Patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF demonstrated significantly lower global longitudinal strain and global radial strain compared to published normal values.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: