Key result
Sacubitril-valsartan use was associated with a significantly decreased risk of ineffective electrical cardioversion (HR 0.35) compared with non-users in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Sacubitril-valsartan ameliorates atrial remodeling and favors sinus rhythm maintenance in AF with heart failure, but its effect in persistent AF is unknown.
Does sacubitril-valsartan reduce the risk of ineffective electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=76)
No
Does sacubitril-valsartan reduce the risk of ineffective electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.35 (95% CI 0.14–0.91)
Absolute Event Rate: 25% vs 52%
p-value: p=0.02
Pre-treatment with sacubitril-valsartan is associated with a significantly decreased risk of ineffective electrical cardioversion and early AF recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Should not yet change cardioversion practice in persistent AF; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation.
Background Existing studies have shown that sacubitril-valsartan ameliorated atrial remodeling in atrial fibrillation (AF) and favored maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with AF and heart failure. However, the effect of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with persistent AF is yet unknown. We aimed to evaluate the effect of sacubitril-valsartan on restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF who underwent electrical cardioversion (ECV). Method Consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent ECV between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2020 were investigated in this retrospective cohort study. All eligible patients were categorized into sacubitril-valsartan users and sacubitril-valsartan non-users based on whether they received treatment with sacubitril-valsartan or not. The endpoint was ineffictive ECV, defined as the composite of failure to terminate AF or any recurrence of AF during 30 days follow-up. Results A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study, including 28 sacubitril-valsartan users and 48 non-users. Within a follow-up of 30 days after ECV, the endpoint had occurred in 7 (25%) of 28 sacubitril-valsartan users and 25 (52%) of 48 non-users. Significantly lower rate of ineffictive ECV in sacubitril-valsartan users compared with non-users was shown in Kaplan-Meier survival curves ( P = 0.02; Log-rank test). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that sacubitril-valsartan use (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14–0.91), amiodarone use (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13–0.78), left atrial diameter ≤ 39 mm (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06–0.71) were independently associated with a decreased rate of ineffective electrical cardioversion. Conclusion Use of sacubitril-valsartan is associated with a significantly decreased risk of ineffective ECV compared with non-users in patients with persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=76). Sacubitril-valsartan vs. Sacubitril-valsartan non-users was evaluated on Ineffective electrical cardioversion (composite of failure to terminate AF or any recurrence of AF during 30 days follow-up) (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.91, p=0.02). Sacubitril-valsartan use was associated with a significantly decreased risk of ineffective electrical cardioversion (HR 0.35) compared with non-users in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: