Comprehensive evaluation of anomaly detection methods in chemical processes, suggesting effective techniques for industry applications.
This paper provides the first comprehensive evaluation and analysis of modern (deep‐learning‐based) unsupervised anomaly detection methods for chemical process data. We focus on the Tennessee Eastman process dataset, a standard litmus test to benchmark anomaly detection methods for nearly three decades. Our extensive study will facilitate choosing appropriate anomaly detection methods in industrial applications. From the benchmark, we conclude that reconstruction‐based methods are the methods of choice, followed by generative and forecasting‐based methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartung et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: