Key result
Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with non-conditional CIEDs caused no adverse clinical events, with most device parameters showing ≤20% change from baseline.
Why the study?
CIEDs have historically restricted the use of MRI due to potential clinical and configurational risks associated with electromagnetic interference.
Does MRI cause adverse clinical events or clinically meaningful device parameter changes in patients with non-conditional cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
Observational (n=492)
No
Does MRI cause adverse clinical events or clinically meaningful device parameter changes in patients with non-conditional cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
MRI appears safe for patients with non-conditional CIEDs, causing no clinically meaningful device parameter changes or adverse clinical events.
May support MRI in non-conditional CIEDs; hypothesis-generating, needs randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have historically restricted the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to the potential clinical and configurational risks associated with electromagnetic interference. In this study, the authors investigated the impact of MRI on the functional integrity of non-conditional CIEDs and their clinical correlates. METHODS: In this prospective, observational single-center study, we enrolled patients undergoing MRI over a 5-year period. Prior to assessing the impact of MRI on CIEDs, we performed interrogations in sequential duplication to assess the intrinsic variability of devices. Subsequently, we performed interrogations immediately after MRI, and monitored changes in device parameters and clinical events. RESULTS: We completed 492 MRI studies, 58% in patients with permanent pacemakers (PPMs) and 42% with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Subsequent MRI exposures occurred in 15% encounters. Accounting for intrinsic variability in CIED leads, there were no significant changes in RA, RV, or LV parameters after MRI, regardless of the region imaged (thoracic vs. non-thoracic), type of CIED (PPMs vs. ICDs) and among those with serial MRIs. When ranked for % change pre- to post-MRI, the majority of RA, RV, and LV metrics for thresholds, sensing, and impedance conformed to ≤20% change from baseline. No significant clinical adverse cardiac events or effect on device microcircuitry occurred during the study. CONCLUSION: Incorporating a novel reproducibility tactic, there were neither clinically meaningful device parameter changes nor adverse clinical events during or following MRIs, suggesting the effects of MRI on non-conditional CIED integrity are far less than previously perceived.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahiya et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Non-conditional cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (n=492). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. Pre-MRI baseline was evaluated on Changes in device parameters (RA, RV, LV) and clinical events. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with non-conditional CIEDs caused no adverse clinical events, with most device parameters showing ≤20% change from baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: