Key result
Between 2010 and 2017, inpatient cardiac rehabilitation participation increased from 18.3% to 39.0%, while outpatient participation remained extremely low, reaching only 2.5% in 2017.
Why the study?
What are the trends in the implementation and participation rates of inpatient and outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Japan between 2010 and 2017?
Observational (n=2,046,302)
Yes
What are the trends in the implementation and participation rates of inpatient and outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Japan between 2010 and 2017?
While inpatient cardiac rehabilitation participation in Japan has doubled from 2010 to 2017, outpatient cardiac rehabilitation remains severely underutilized, highlighting a significant gap in secondary prevention.
Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation remains severely underutilized; leaves open the need for implementation research to close this gap.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanazawa et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=2,046,302). Time period (2017) vs. Time period (2010) was evaluated on Inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) participation rate. Between 2010 and 2017, inpatient cardiac rehabilitation participation increased from 18.3% to 39.0%, while outpatient participation remained extremely low, reaching only 2.5% in 2017.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: