Key result
Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of participating in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 10.2).
Why the study?
Poor implementation and variable quality of cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease have been a global concern, prompting an assessment of participation and associated factors in Japan.
Cohort (n=87,829)
Yes
Implementation of cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease in Japan is insufficient (32% participation), with significant variation based on procedure type and geographic region.
Low CR participation (32%) post-revascularization signals implementation gaps; leaves open effective strategies to improve uptake in routine care.
Poor implementation and variable quality of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for coronary heart disease (CHD) have been a global concern. This nationwide study aimed to clarify the implementation of and participation in CR among CHD patients and associated factors in Japan. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data extracted from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 2017-2018 were included. Aspects of CR were assessed in terms of (1) participation in exercise-based CR, (2) pharmacological education, and (3) nutritional education. Of 87,829 eligible patients, 32% had participated in exercise-based CR, with a mean program length of 40 ± 71 days. CABG was associated with higher CR participation compared to PCI (OR 10.2, 95% CI 9.6-10.8). Patients living in the Kyushu region were more likely to participate in CR (OR 2.59, 95% CI 2.39-2.81). Among patients who participated in CR, 92% received pharmacological education, whereas only 67% received nutritional education. In Japan, the implementation of CR for CHD is insufficient and involved varying personal, therapeutic, and geographical factors. CR implementation needs to be promoted in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohtera et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=87,829). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was evaluated on Participation in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (OR 10.2, 95% CI 9.6-10.8, p=<0.01). Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of participating in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 10.2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: