A method to identify successful technical-tactical (T-T) systems could produce important benefits for coaches and researchers. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to conduct a discriminant analysis among T-T systems used by winning and losing athletes during high-level judo competition. The sample consisted of 174 combats (145 winners and 39 losers) contested between 2011 and 2012 by 21 men from the half-middleweight class (-81 kg) who qualified for the 2012 London Olympic Games. The T-T variables were analyzed according to frequency of occurrence and included the following indicators: Approach (No Form, Right and Left Antero-posterior Positions and Attempted Gripping); Gripping (Left and/or Right Collar, Sleeve and/or Back Gripping combinations); and Attack (Ashi-waza, Koshi-waza, Te-waza, Sutemi-waza, Osae-waza, Shime-waza and Kansetsu-waza). Cluster analysis was used to group outcomes and T-T variables, according to homogeneous groups. Findings showed divergent T-T systems, where winning athletes showed lower values of Approach (Left Antero-posterior), and higher values of Gripping (Left Back/Right Sleeve and Right Sleeve) than losing athletes. Consequently, the prescription of T-T training should consider the specific tactical demands of the weight category. The results of the current investigation indicate that in male half-middleweight judo athletes, Approach and Gripping strategies are the main discriminant indicators of performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miarka et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: