Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We are forced to accept as [an] alternative that the random spinning of a roulette manufactured and daily readjusted with extraordinary care is not obedient to the laws of chance, but is chaotic in its manifestations! (Karl Pearson 1894) Given integers k ≥ k 0 ≥ 2, a test of fixed sample size and a sequential test are constructed for the purpose of testing the null hypothesis that max1≤i≤k p i ≤ 1/k 0, against the alternative that max1≤i≤k p i > 1/k 0, where p 1, …, pk are the parameters of a multinomial distribution with k cells. Results are applied to the problem of testing for favorable numbers on a roulette wheel, in which case k = 38 and k 0 = 36, thereby providing a partial solution to a problem posed by Wilson (1965).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. N. Ethier (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: