Why the study?
Does abolition of specific pulmonary receptors alter the heart rate response to acute hypoxemia in anesthetized rabbits?
Does abolition of specific pulmonary receptors alter the heart rate response to acute hypoxemia in anesthetized rabbits?
In rabbits, slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors are responsible for the tachycardiac response to progressive hypoxemia.
Receptor ablation blunts hypoxemic tachycardia in rabbits; leaves open relevance to human cardiorespiratory reflexes.
We studied the effect of pulmonary afferent activity on the heart rate response to a progressive, isocapnic decrease in oxygen saturation (SaO2) in anesthetized rabbits. To abolish the effect of rapidly adapting receptors, we used inhaled bupivacaine aerosol, and to abolish the effect of slowly adapting stretch receptor activity, we used sulfur dioxide insufflation. The heart rate (HR) response (delta HR/delta SaO2) under control conditions was 0.39 +/- 1.29 beats/min/% (mean +/- SD, n = 11; values greater than 0 indicate a tachycardiac response to hypoxemia). After sulfur dioxide insufflation, all nine rabbits had a bradycardiac response (-2.02 +/- 1.13 beats/min/%), which was significantly less than control (p less than 0.0001). After bupivacaine inhalation, the heart rate response (0.27 +/- 1.04 beats/min/%) was unchanged from control. There were no significant differences in the percent increase of minute ventilation during hypoxemia in all runs. Our results indicate that in rabbits the receptors responsible for the increase in heart rate during progressive hypoxemia are the slowly adapting receptors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kato et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: