Key result
Ezetimibe plus statin is linked to ~65% greater FMD versus statin monotherapy in high-risk ASCVD.
Why the study?
Impaired endothelial function predicts cardiovascular events in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, prompting comparison of endothelial function in high-risk patients on optimized statin therapy with versus without ezetimibe.
Does the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy improve endothelial function in high-risk patients with ASCVD?
Cross-Sectional (n=91)
Does the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy improve endothelial function in high-risk patients with ASCVD?
The addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy in high-risk ASCVD patients is associated with improved endothelial function and lower systemic inflammation compared to statin monotherapy.
Hypothesis-generating for endothelial benefit with ezetimibe add-on in high-risk ASCVD; prospective trials needed before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Impaired endothelial function predicts cardiovascular (CV) events, even in patients with established atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). The aim of this post hoc analysis was to compare the endothelial function between high-risk patients on optimized statin therapy with and without additional ezetimibe treatment. METHODS: A total of 91 patients with ASCVD and statin treatment (atorvastatin or rosuvastatin) were included and underwent examination of endothelial function by the UNEX EF device. Endothelial function parameters were compared between patients with ezetimibe (E+ group) and without ezetimibe therapy (E- group) (NCT03626831). RESULTS: Compared to patients in the E- group (n = 70), patients in the E+ group (n = 21) were younger (67.0 ± 7.4 vs 61.2 ± 7.2 years; P = .002), had lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (91.2 ± 13.3 vs 102.0 ± 18.1 mg/dL; P = .013) and lower office systolic blood pressure (123.9 ± 11.4 vs 130.2 ± 14.5 mm Hg; P = .042). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was lower in the E+ group than in the E- group (0.5 ± 0.4 vs 1.1 ± 0.9 mg/L; P = .037). We found a greater flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (6.1 ± 2.0 vs 3.7 ± 3.2%; P = .004) and lower brachial intima-media thickness (0.28 ± 0.1 vs 0.32 ± 0 mm; P = .011) in the E+ group compared to the E- group. When confounders were entered in a covariance analysis, the differences in FMD (P = .034) and hsCRP (P = .049) between the groups remained significant. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional analysis, we observed a difference of FMD suggesting potentially better endothelial function in high-risk ASCVD patients on ezetimibe plus statin compared to statin monotherapy; however, causal conclusions cannot be drawn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Günes-Altan et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=91). Ezetimibe plus statin therapy vs. Statin monotherapy (without ezetimibe) was evaluated on Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (p=.004). Ezetimibe plus statin therapy was associated with greater flow-mediated vasodilation compared to statin monotherapy in high-risk ASCVD patients (6.1% vs 3.7%; P=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: