Key result
Light Heart app shows ~100% agreement with ECG for measuring pulse intervals in young adults.
Why the study?
Mobile apps can assess pulse interval in the real world, but measurement accuracy needs to be established prior to implementation.
Does the Light Heart mobile app accurately measure pulse interval and heart rate variability compared to ECG in healthy young adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=14)
Does the Light Heart mobile app accurately measure pulse interval and heart rate variability compared to ECG in healthy young adults?
The Light Heart mobile app provides valid and accurate measurements of pulse interval and heart rate variability in healthy young adults, offering a reliable tool for real-world physiological assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports app accuracy for pulse interval in healthy young adults; leaves open validation in clinical populations.
BACKGROUND Pulse interval is a biomarker of psychological and physiological health. Pulse interval can now be assessed using mobile phone apps, which expands researchers’ ability to assess pulse interval in the real world. Prior to implementation, measurement accuracy should be established. OBJECTIVE This investigation evaluated the validity of the Light Heart mobile app to measure pulse interval and pulse rate variability in healthy young adults. METHODS Validity was assessed by comparing the pulse interval and SD of normal pulse intervals obtained by Light Heart to the gold standard, electrocardiogram (ECG), in 14 young healthy individuals (mean age 24, SD 5 years; n=9, 64% female) in a seated posture. RESULTS Mean pulse interval (Light Heart: 859, SD 113 ms; ECG: 857, SD 112 ms) demonstrated a strong positive linear correlation (r=0.99; P<.001) and strong agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient=1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.00) between techniques. The Bland-Altman plot demonstrated good agreement for the mean pulse interval measured with Light Heart and ECG with evidence of fixed bias (–1.56, SD 1.86; 95% CI –5.2 to 2.1 ms), suggesting that Light Heart overestimates pulse interval by a small margin. When Bland-Altman plots were constructed for each participant’s beat-by-beat pulse interval data, all participants demonstrated strong agreement between Light Heart and ECG with no evidence of fixed bias between measures. Heart rate variability, assessed by SD of normal pulse intervals, demonstrated strong agreement between techniques (Light Heart: mean 73, SD 23 ms; ECG: mean 73, SD 22 ms; r=0.99; P<.001; intraclass correlation coefficient=0.99, 95% CI 0.97-1.00). CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence to suggest that the Light Heart mobile app provides valid measures of pulse interval and heart rate variability in healthy young adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klassen et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=14). Light Heart mobile app vs. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated on Mean pulse interval (ICC 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, p=<.001). The Light Heart mobile app demonstrated strong agreement with ECG for measuring mean pulse interval in healthy young adults.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: