Key result
Inappropriate MPI use linked to higher median lifetime cancer risk vs appropriate testing.
Why the study?
Does inappropriate use of myocardial perfusion imaging increase the estimated lifetime attributable risk of cancer compared to appropriate use?
Cohort (n=1,511)
Yes
Does inappropriate use of myocardial perfusion imaging increase the estimated lifetime attributable risk of cancer compared to appropriate use?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.08% vs 0.06%
p-value: p=<0.001
Applying appropriate use criteria to patient selection for myocardial perfusion imaging can mitigate unnecessary radiation exposure and enhance the overall clinical benefit-to-risk ratio.
Supports prioritizing appropriate use criteria for MPI to reduce radiation exposure; leaves open whether this reduces actual cancer incidence.
UNLABELLED: The impact of appropriate use criteria (AUC) for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with SPECT on the estimated lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer is unknown. METHODS: A cohort of 1,511 consecutive patients who underwent clinically indicated (99m)Tc-setamibi MPI were categorized into appropriate/uncertain (n = 823) versus inappropriate (n = 688) use groups according to the 2009 AUC and were prospectively followed for 27 ± 10 mo. Logistic regression models were used to determine the annualized probability of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of cardiac death or myocardial infarction and the probability of revascularization within 6 mo of MPI, accounting for relevant covariates. We determined LAR for each subject on the basis of accepted risk estimates. We calculated MPI's benefit-to-risk ratios, defined by the annualized predicted MACE-to-LAR ratio and the predicted 6-mo-revascularization-to-LAR ratio. RESULTS: During follow-up, there were 22 MACE and 29 6-mo revascularizations. The administered radioactivity and effective radiation doses absorbed were similar between the study groups. Patients with inappropriate MPI had significantly higher LAR (median, 0.08% vs. 0.06%, P < 0.001), lower predicted MACE-to-LAR ratio (median, 1.5 vs. 4.3, P < 0.001), and lower predicted 6-mo-revascularization-to-LAR ratio (median, 5.4 vs. 15.5, P < 0.001). Women had higher LAR (median, 0.08% vs. 0.07%, P < 0.001) and lower predicted MACE-to-LAR ratio (median, 1.9 vs. 3.3, P < 0.001) and 6-mo-revascularization-to-LAR ratio (median, 4.4 vs. 17.5, P < 0.001). However, appropriate/uncertain use negated the difference between men and women in LAR (P = 0.94) and the predicted MACE-to-LAR ratio (P = 0.97). CONCLUSION: Inappropriate MPI use is associated with excess cancer risk and lower MPI's benefit-to-risk ratio. Appropriate/uncertain use neutralizes the sex gap in LAR with MPI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doukky et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Clinically indicated myocardial perfusion imaging (n=1,511). Inappropriate myocardial perfusion imaging vs. Appropriate or uncertain myocardial perfusion imaging was evaluated on Estimated lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer (p=<0.001). Inappropriate myocardial perfusion imaging use was associated with a significantly higher median estimated lifetime attributable risk of cancer (0.08% vs 0.06%, p<0.001) compared to appropriate or uncertain use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: