Key result
Extended KDQOL-CF identifies subjective cognitive complaints in hemodialysis patients with ~76% accuracy.
Why the study?
Cognitive impairment is prevalent in haemodialysis patients, but standard neuropsychological tests are time-consuming and lack routine implementation guidelines. The study evaluated an extended KDQOL-CF questionnaire with an added memory item to improve detection of cognitive symptoms.
Does an extended version of the KDQOL-CF accurately identify cognitive impairments and predict functional impairment and treatment nonadherence in haemodialysis patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=268)
Yes
Does an extended version of the KDQOL-CF accurately identify cognitive impairments and predict functional impairment and treatment nonadherence in haemodialysis patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 76.2%
Absolute Event Rate: 76.2% vs 74.8%
p-value: p=0.173
The extended KDQOL-CF is a valid, self-administered screening tool that accurately identifies subjective cognitive complaints and predicts functional impairment and treatment nonadherence in haemodialysis patients.
May support cognitive screening in haemodialysis; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment and cognitive complaints are highly prevalent in haemodialysis patients and are associated with adverse health outcomes. Currently, there is no established guideline on cognitive screening in this population. Although neuropsychological tests are the gold standard measure of cognition, they are time-consuming and require trained personnel. The Kidney Disease Quality of Life Cognitive Function subscale (KDQOL-CF), a self-administered questionnaire with only three items, may be a feasible alternative for busy renal settings. In this study, we validated an extended version of KDQOL-CF by including an additional memory item (i.e., "How much of the time during the past four weeks did you have memory difficulties?") to improve its ability to capture memory impairments that are common in dialysis patients but missing in the original scale. METHODS: A total of 268 haemodialysis patients treated in 10 dialysis centres in Singapore completed the extended KDQOL-CF and gold standard measures of objective cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and subjective cognition (Patient's Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory). Patients also self-reported their functional impairment and treatment nonadherence. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the extended KDQOL-CF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to determine the diagnostic ability of the extended KDQOL-CF in identifying objective cognitive impairments and subjective cognitive complaints. Additionally, we examined associations between the extended KDQOL-CF and patients' self-reported functional impairment and treatment nonadherence. RESULTS: The extended KDQOL-CF can be explained by a one-factor model and has good internal consistency and convergent validity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis provided support for the diagnostic accuracy of the extended KDQOL-CF in identifying objective cognitive impairments (area under curve = 60.9%) and subjective cognitive complaints (area under curve = 76.2%). The extended KDQOL-CF also performed better than the original KDQOL-CF in predicting functional impairment and treatment nonadherence in the recruited patients. CONCLUSIONS: The extended KDQOL-CF may be used as a first-step cognitive screening tool in dialysis settings to offer a gateway for further diagnostic evaluation and preventive or rehabilitative programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in End-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis (n=268). Extended KDQOL-CF vs. Original KDQOL-CF was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (AUC) for identifying subjective cognitive complaints (AUC 76.2%, p=0.173). The extended KDQOL-CF demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy in identifying subjective cognitive complaints (AUC 76.2%) and sufficient accuracy for objective cognitive impairments (AUC 60.9%) in haemodialysis patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: