Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Accurate quantification of soil organic matter (SOM) and carbon content is critical for understanding climate change, evaluating soil health, supporting agricultural sustainability, and implementing carbon sequestration policies. For decades, classical analytical and statistical approaches have underpinned soil carbon assessment, but the emergence of machine learning (ML) techniques offers new opportunities to improve prediction accuracy, scalability, and efficiency. This review summarises the current knowledge on classical and ML-based approaches for analysing SOM and carbon content. We examine the strengths, limitations, and practical applications of conventional methods, including wet chemistry, dry combustion analysis, and geostatistical techniques, alongside modern ML approaches such as random forests (RFs), gradient boosting machines, neural networks, deep learning, and hybrid ML-geostatistical frameworks. Special emphasis is placed on comparative analysis across dimensions, including prediction accuracy, computational requirements, data availability needs, interpretability, uncertainty quantification, and scalability. Soil carbon stocks and dynamics are tightly regulated by indigenous soil microbial communities and their management-driven alterations, creating substantial biologically driven variation that remains difficult to capture with current modelling approaches. We therefore explore hybrid approaches that integrate classical pedological knowledge with ML capabilities. Finally, we discuss emerging challenges, future research directions, and the complementary role these approaches play in advancing soil carbon science. This review concludes that neither classical nor ML approaches alone are sufficient for accurate carbon assessment across diverse scales and environments. Instead, their strategic integration, combining classical mechanistic grounding alongside machine learning’s scalability, represents the most promising path toward realistic soil carbon evaluation for climate change mitigation and agricultural sustainability.
Dolatabadian et al. (Fri,) studied this question.