Key result
ECG and PPG-based emotion recognition review highlights existing gaps and future research directions.
Why the study?
Emotion recognition systems increasingly use cardio-based physiological signals, but a comprehensive synthesis of emotion models, elicitation, and development methods is needed to identify existing gaps.
Systematic Review
This systematic review highlights the methods, gaps, and future directions for developing emotion recognition systems using ECG and PPG signals.
ECG/PPG emotion recognition systems require further validation before clinical use; extends prior reviews by mapping gaps and research priorities.
There is a growing demand for emotion recognition systems (ERS) to be adopted in everyday life from various fields, particularly automotive, education, and social security. Recently, the use of cardio-based physiological signals, electrocardiogram (ECG), and photoplethysmogram (PPG) in ERS has yielded promising results. Furthermore, the development of wearable devices equipped with cardio-based physiological sensors has significantly aided towards the adoption of ERS in daily life. This paper systematically reviews emotion recognition using cardio-based physiological signals, encompassing emotion models, emotion elicitation methods, and ERS development methods, emphasizing feature extraction, feature selection methods, feature dimension reduction methods, and classifiers. A summary and comparison of recent studies are presented to highlight existing studies’ gaps and suggest future research for better ERS especially using cardio-based signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismail et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Emotion recognition. Emotion recognition using cardio-based physiological signals (ECG and PPG) was evaluated. A systematic review of emotion recognition using cardio-based physiological signals (ECG and PPG) highlights existing gaps and suggests future research directions for emotion recognition systems.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: