Key result
Ventricular fibrillation activation rate was faster in the posterior left ventricle than in the anterior left ventricle (10.0±1.3 Hz vs 9.3±1.3 Hz; P<0.001) in a porcine model.
Quantitative regional differences exist over the porcine LV epicardium during VF, with findings partially supporting but not totally consistent with a dominant domain (mother rotor) within the LV free wall.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regional VF heterogeneity in porcine LV; hypothesis-generating for rotor mechanisms, requiring human studies before any clinical relevance.
It has been hypothesized that during ventricular fibrillation (VF), the fastest activating region, the dominant domain, contains a stable reentrant circuit called a mother rotor. This hypothesis postulates that the mother rotor spawns wavefronts that propagate to maintain VF elsewhere and implies that the ratio of wavefronts propagating off a region to those propagating onto it (propoff/propon) should be >1 for the dominant domain but <1 elsewhere. To test this prediction in the left ventricular (LV) epicardium of a large animal, most of the LV free wall was mapped with 1008 electrodes in 7 pigs. VF activation rate was faster in the posterior than in the anterior LV (10.0+/-1.3Hz versus 9.3+/-1.3Hz; P<0.001). The anterior LV had a higher fraction of wavefronts that blocked than did the posterior LV and had a propoff/propon ratio <1 (P<0.001). The mean conduction velocity vectors of the VF wavefronts pointed in the direction from the posterior to the anterior LV. Although these findings favor a dominant domain in the posterior LV, the facts that the anterior LV had a higher incidence of reentry than did the posterior LV and that the posterior LV did not have propoff/propon significantly different from 1 do not. Thus, quantitative regional differences are present over the porcine LV epicardium during VF. Although these differences are not totally consistent with the presence of a dominant domain within the LV free wall, the mean conduction velocity vector is consistent with one in the septum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nanthakumar et al. (2002) studied Ventricular fibrillation (n=7). Posterior left ventricle vs. Anterior left ventricle was evaluated on VF activation rate (p=<0.001). Ventricular fibrillation activation rate was faster in the posterior left ventricle than in the anterior left ventricle (10.0±1.3 Hz vs 9.3±1.3 Hz; P<0.001) in a porcine model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: