Key result
Clinic-based therapy dog visits cut missed haemodialysis treatments by ~76% versus pre-exposure.
Why the study?
Maintaining haemodialysis adherence is paramount to health, and the study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a clinic-based animal-assisted intervention to improve treatment adherence.
Does a clinic-based animal-assisted intervention improve treatment adherence in haemodialysis patients?
Does a clinic-based animal-assisted intervention improve treatment adherence in haemodialysis patients?
Odds Ratio: 0.24 (95% CI 0.09–0.62)
p-value: p=0.003
Therapy dog visits in the dialysis clinic setting are feasible and significantly reduce the probability of missed hemodialysis treatments while improving self-reported pain, depression, and anxiety.
May support therapy dog visits to improve hemodialysis adherence; leaves open causal confirmation in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Maintaining adherence to one's haemodialysis regimen is paramount to overall health and well-being. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a clinic-based animal-assisted intervention for improving patients' treatment adherence. METHODS: Using an interrupted time series analysis, this study examined the probability of unplanned missed haemodialysis treatment not due to hospitalization upon introducing therapy dog visits into the clinic, following a 3-month lead-in phase before dog exposure. An interrupted time series model was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of weekly non-adherence after dog exposure relative to pre-exposure adherence. Depression, anxiety and pain were secondary outcomes and were evaluated within-subjects based on self-reported ratings before and after each dog visit. RESULTS: Of the eligible clinic dialysis patients, 100% enrolled (17 of 17) and 82% (14 of 17) completed the study. The effect estimate for the reduction in probability of missing haemodialysis treatments following dog exposure phase compared to pre-exposure was OR 0.24 [95% CI: 0.09-0.62] (p = 0.003). Significant immediate mean reductions were also observed in self-reported pain (p = 0.004), depression (p = 0.029), anxiety (p = 0.019) and negative affect (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: As the first study to evaluate therapy dog visits as a treatment adherence intervention for patients receiving haemodialysis, findings indicate this animal-assisted intervention is feasible and well accepted by patients based on high rates of study engagement and low rates of dropout. Meaningful human-animal interaction in the clinic setting may provide motivation to avoid appointment no-shows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stensland et al. (2025) studied Haemodialysis (n=17). Therapy dog visits vs. Pre-exposure phase was evaluated on Probability of unplanned missed haemodialysis treatment not due to hospitalization (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.62, p=0.003). Clinic-based therapy dog visits significantly reduced the probability of missed haemodialysis treatments compared to the pre-exposure phase (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.62; p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: