Vitality predicts level of guideline‐concordant care in routine treatment of mood, anxiety and somatoform disorders

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical and psychosocial correlates of adherence to treatment guidelines among outpatients with common mental disorders in a routine clinical setting. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed 192 patients who were treated for a mood, anxiety or somatoform disorder with pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy or a combination of both treatment modalities. Guideline adherence was assessed with a disorder independent set of quality indicators during up to 3 years of follow-up. At baseline, a standardized diagnostic interview, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and demographic variables were assessed. Using multivariable regression analysis we identified independent predictors associated with guideline adherence. RESULTS: Patients were aged 36.8 years (SD 11.6) on average. The majority of patients were treated with psychotherapy (47.4%), followed by pharmacotherapy (37.5%) and a combination of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy (15.1%). Three adherence groups were defined: low (29.7%), intermediate (43.2%) and high (27.1%). Univariate predictors of low adherence were low scores on the subscales vitality and social functioning of the SF-36. In the multivariable model, low adherence was independently predicted by a score lower than 50 on the subscale vitality of the SF-36 (odds ratio per 10 units increase in vitality = 1.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.71). No significant differences were found within socio-demographic variables, co-morbidity and the scores on the BSI subscales between the adherence groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with low scores on the vitality subscale of the SF-36 were at the highest risk to receive low guideline-concordant care. Understanding factors that affect treatment adherence may help to prevent non-adherence and increase the quality of care as well as cost-effectiveness.