Key result
Adjusting ventricular pacing rate to intrinsic heart rate during mode switching from DDD to VVI pacing significantly minimized the drop in O2 consumption compared to a fixed rate (-0.6% vs -8.2%, P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does pacing rate adaptation to intrinsic heart rate after mode switching improve respiratory gas exchange and subjective effort during low intensity exercise in patients with DDD pacemakers?
RCT (n=15)
Single-blind
Randomized crossover
Does pacing rate adaptation to intrinsic heart rate after mode switching improve respiratory gas exchange and subjective effort during low intensity exercise in patients with DDD pacemakers?
Adjusting ventricular pacing rate to the level of physical activity after mode switching from DDD to VVI pacing improves exercise tolerance and gas exchange.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rate-adaptive pacing during DDD-to-VVI mode switch preserves exercise capacity; extends physiologic pacing benefits to low-intensity activity in RCT evidence.
Automatic mode switching from DDD(R) to DDI(R) or VVI(R) pacing modes has improved dual chamber pacing in patients at high risk for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, little is known about the effect of ventricular pacing rate adaptation after mode switching. We conducted a single-blinded, crossover study in 15 patients (58 +/- 21 years) with a DDD pacemaker who had AV block and normal sinus node function to investigate the influence of pacing rate adaptation to intrinsic heart rate during low intensity exercise. Patients performed two tests (A/B) of low intensity treadmill exercise (0.5 W/kg) in randomized order. They initially walked for 6 minutes while paced in DDD mode. The pacing mode was then switched to VVI with a pacing rate of either 70 beats/min (test A) or matched to the intrinsic heart rate (95 +/- 11 beats/min test B). Respiratory gas exchange variables were determined and patients classified the effort before and after mode switching on a Borg scale from 6 to 20. Percentage changes of respiratory gas exchange measurements were significantly larger (O2 consumption: -8.2 +/- 5.0% vs. -0.6 +/- 7.2%; ventilatory equivalent of CO2 exhalation: 5.3 +/- 4.9% vs. 1.5 +/- 4.3%; respiratory exchange ratio: 7.0 +/- 2.2% vs. 3.5 +/- 3.0%; end-tidal CO2: -5.7 +/- 2.9% vs. -1.8 +/- 2.7%; all P < 0.01) and the increase in subjective assessment of the effort tended to be higher (mean increase on Borg scale: 1.6 +/- 1.9 vs. 1.1 +/- 1.8, P = 0.07) after heart rate unadjusted than after adjusted mode switching. Mode switching from DDD to VVI pacing is better tolerated and gas exchange measurements are less influenced if ventricular pacing rate is adjusted to the level of physical activity. Thus, pacing rate adjustment should be considered as part of automatic mode switch algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocca et al. (2000) conducted an RCT in AV block and normal sinus node function with a DDD pacemaker (n=15). VVI pacing with rate matched to intrinsic heart rate vs. VVI pacing with a fixed rate of 70 beats/min was evaluated on Percentage change in O2 consumption (p=<0.01). Adjusting ventricular pacing rate to intrinsic heart rate during mode switching from DDD to VVI pacing significantly minimized the drop in O2 consumption compared to a fixed rate (-0.6% vs -8.2%, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: