Why the study?
Does MR imaging improve the diagnosis of cardiac mass lesions compared to or in addition to 2D echocardiography in patients with suspected cardiac or pericardial mass?
Population
30 patients with a suspected cardiac or pericardial mass
Comparison
MR imaging vs 2D echocardiography (performed in 26 patients)
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
MR may aid diagnosis when echocardiography is nondiagnostic; leaves open need for prospective validation before routine adoption.
Does MR imaging improve the diagnosis of cardiac mass lesions compared to or in addition to 2D echocardiography in patients with suspected cardiac or pericardial mass?
MR imaging is a valuable diagnostic tool for cardiac mass lesions, particularly when 2D echocardiography is equivocal or inadequate.
Gomes et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: