Key result
Combination treatment with sodium nitrite and isoquercetin did not significantly improve flow-mediated vasodilation compared with placebo (net change 0.8%; 95% CI -0.9 to 2.5).
Why the study?
Endothelial dysfunction is common in CKD, prompting testing of the efficacy and safety of combination treatment with sodium nitrite and isoquercetin on biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction.
Does combination treatment with sodium nitrite and isoquercetin improve flow-mediated vasodilation in patients with predialysis CKD?
RCT (n=70)
Double-blind
randomly assigned
Does combination treatment with sodium nitrite and isoquercetin improve flow-mediated vasodilation in patients with predialysis CKD?
Mean Difference: 0.8 (95% CI -0.9–2.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.1% vs 0.3%
Combination treatment with sodium nitrite and isoquercetin for 12 weeks did not significantly improve flow-mediated vasodilation or other endothelial function biomarkers compared with placebo in patients with predialysis CKD.
Does not support sodium nitrite plus isoquercetin for endothelial function in predialysis CKD; confirms null effect on FMD in this RCT.
Background and objectives Endothelial dysfunction is common among patients with CKD. We tested the efficacy and safety of combination treatment with sodium nitrite and isoquercetin on biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in patients with CKD. Design, setting, participants, & measurements This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 pilot trial enrolled 70 patients with predialysis CKD. Thirty-five were randomly assigned to combination treatment with sodium nitrite (40 mg twice daily) and isoquercetin (225 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, and 35 were randomly assigned to placebo. The primary outcome was mean change in flow-mediated vasodilation over the 12-week intervention. Secondary and safety outcomes included biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress as well as kidney function, methemoglobin, and adverse events. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Results Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, race, cigarette smoking, history of hypertension and diabetes, use of renin-angiotensin system blockers, BP, fasting glucose, lipid profile, kidney function, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, and endothelial biomarkers, were comparable between groups. Over the 12-week intervention, flow-mediated vasodilation increased 1.1% (95% confidence interval, −0.1 to 2.3) in the treatment group and 0.3% (95% confidence interval, −0.9 to 1.5) in the placebo group, and net change was 0.8% (95% confidence interval, −0.9 to 2.5). In addition, changes in biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction (vascular adhesion molecule-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, E-selectin, vWf, endostatin, and asymmetric dimethylarginine), inflammation (TNF- α , IL-6, C-reactive protein, IL-1 receptor antagonist, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1), and oxidative stress (oxidized LDL and nitrotyrosines) were not significantly different between the two groups. Furthermore, changes in eGFR, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, methemoglobin, and adverse events were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions This randomized phase 2 pilot trial suggests that combination treatment with sodium nitrite and isoquercetin did not significantly improve flow-mediated vasodilation or other endothelial function biomarkers but also did not increase adverse events compared with placebo among patients with CKD. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Nitrite, Isoquercetin, and Endothelial Dysfunction (NICE), NCT02552888
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in predialysis CKD (n=70). sodium nitrite and isoquercetin vs. placebo was evaluated on mean change in flow-mediated vasodilation over the 12-week intervention (net change 0.8%, 95% CI -0.9 to 2.5). Combination treatment with sodium nitrite and isoquercetin did not significantly improve flow-mediated vasodilation compared with placebo (net change 0.8%; 95% CI -0.9 to 2.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: