Key result
In subjects older than 35 years, static distensibility of the carotid artery was significantly higher than dynamic distensibility (3.8 vs 2.1 x 10^-3 mmHg^-1, p<0.001).
Why the study?
How do dynamic and static distensibility of the common carotid artery relate in healthy volunteers across different ages?
Cross-Sectional (n=28)
How do dynamic and static distensibility of the common carotid artery relate in healthy volunteers across different ages?
With increasing age, static distensibility overestimates the distension capacity of large arteries compared to dynamic distensibility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Static distensibility may overestimate arterial compliance with age; leaves open whether dynamic measures improve vascular risk assessment.
In clinical studies, the elastic behavior of central arteries is usually assessed by measuring dynamic distensibility. In this study, we aimed to investigate how dynamic and static distensibility of the common carotid artery (Ddyn and Dstat, respectively) are related in 28 healthy volunteers of 20–71 years. The carotid diameter and its change with the pressure pulse were measured using an ultrasound echo-tracking device. Arterial blood pressure was measured by Finapres and carotid pressure was determined by applanation tonometry. Ddyn was determined at rest using the pressure pulse, while Dstat was determined during pressor responses induced by handgrip or cold pressor test. Data are given as mean ± 1 SD. In younger subjects (<35 years), Dstat did not differ from Ddyn (7.0 ± 3.4 vs. 6.5 ± 2.1·10–³·mm Hg–¹, respectively), whereas in older subjects (>35 years), Dstat was significantly higher than Ddyn (3.8 ± 1.4 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9· 10–³·mm Hg–¹, p < 0.001). For all subjects, Dstat and Ddyn decreased with increasing age and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Using stepwise multiple regression analysis, the strongest predictor of Dstat proved to be MAP, while that of Ddyn was age. Dstat was found to be linearly related to the hysteresis loop area of the pressure-diameter relation (r = 0.94), i.e. to vessel wall viscosity. It is concluded that, with increasing age, static distensibility overestimates the distension capacity of large arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lénárd et al. (2000) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=28). Static distensibility measurement vs. Dynamic distensibility measurement was evaluated on Carotid artery distensibility in subjects >35 years (10^-3 mmHg^-1) (p=<0.001). In subjects older than 35 years, static distensibility of the carotid artery was significantly higher than dynamic distensibility (3.8 vs 2.1 x 10^-3 mmHg^-1, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: