Key result
A verification phase yielded a higher maximal oxygen uptake compared to a graded exercise test alone (61.7 vs. 59.1 mL∙min−1∙kg−1; P=0.041).
Why the study?
To examine whether stroke volume decrement during a graded exercise test is a main factor for underestimation of maximal oxygen uptake.
Does a verification phase yield higher V̇O2max and stroke volume compared to a graded exercise test alone in well-trained male cyclists?
Does a verification phase yield higher V̇O2max and stroke volume compared to a graded exercise test alone in well-trained male cyclists?
A verification phase following a graded exercise test yields higher V̇O2max and stroke volume, suggesting GXT alone may underestimate true maximal oxygen uptake.
May warrant verification phases post-GXT to avoid underestimating VO2max in cyclists; leaves open need for larger trials before protocol changes.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze cardiac output (Qc), stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR), and arterio-venous O2 difference (a−vO2diff) responses throughout a graded exercise test (GXT) and verification phase (VP) to examine whether SV decrement during the GXT is a main factor for underestimation of the maximal O2 uptake (V̇O2max), or not.METHODS: Seven well-trained male cyclists volunteered for this study (V̇O2max: 61.7±6.13 mL∙min−1∙kg−1). Following submaximal tests, participants were asked to perform GXT until exhaustion. Then, multisession verifications were performed on different days using ±3% constant work rates. The highest 30-second mean of V̇O2 was considered as the V̇O2max and corresponding external power as peak power output (PPO). The Qc, SV, HR, and a−vO2diff responses were evaluated at both GXT and VP by nitrous-oxide rebreathing method. After repeated-measures analyses, possible significant differences were investigated by LSD/Wilcoxon.RESULTS: It was shown that the HR and a−vO2diff reached their potentially highest values at the end of the both GXT and VP (192.9±8.8 vs. 190.7±7.9 bpm; 17.1±1.6 vs. 16.9±1.1%, respectively; P>0.05); however, SV (128.8±11.2 vs. 137.3±11.2 mL; P=0.029) and Qc (24.8±2.02 vs. 26.2±2.71 L·min−1; P=0.046) were lower at GXT when compared to the VP. V̇O2 means were, therefore, higher in VP when compared to the GXT (61.7±6.13 vs. 59.1±6.2 mL∙min−1∙kg−1; P=0.041).CONCLUSIONS: The GXT provided only a peak V̇O2 but not the V̇O2max. Consequently, the real V̇O2max and PPO could be provided by only VP administrations. This is likely to result from the lower Qc and SV responses observed from a prolonged incremental test protocol when compared to short bouts of constant work rate trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çolakoğlu et al. (2020) studied Healthy (well-trained male cyclists) (n=7). Verification phase (VP) vs. Graded exercise test (GXT) was evaluated on V̇O2 means (mL∙min−1∙kg−1) (p=0.041). A verification phase yielded a higher maximal oxygen uptake compared to a graded exercise test alone (61.7 vs. 59.1 mL∙min−1∙kg−1; P=0.041).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: