Key result
Visceral adipose tissue area at the L2/3 level ≥142 cm2 for men or 115 cm2 for women significantly increased the odds of hyperglycaemia (OR 3.18; 95% CI 2.45-4.13).
Why the study?
Optimal cut-points of visceral adipose tissue areas at different anatomic levels to discriminate cardiometabolic risk factors in a Chinese middle-aged population were undetermined.
What are the optimal cut-points of visceral adipose tissue areas to identify cardiometabolic risk factors in a Chinese population?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,744)
No
What are the optimal cut-points of visceral adipose tissue areas to identify cardiometabolic risk factors in a Chinese population?
Specific visceral adipose tissue area cut-points at the umbilicus and L2/3 levels can effectively identify Chinese individuals at increased risk for cardiometabolic conditions.
These L2/3 VAT thresholds were associated with hyperglycaemia; leaves open validation for cardiometabolic screening in Chinese adults.
Aim To determine the optimal cut‐points of visceral adipose tissue ( VAT ) areas at different anatomic levels to discriminate participants with cardiometabolic risk factors in a Chinese middle‐aged population. Methods A total of 1744 individuals who underwent regular health checks in Nanjing BENQ Medical Center from January 2013 to December 2016 were included in this cross‐sectional study. VAT areas were measured by abdominal quantitative computed tomography at the L2/3 intervertebral disk and umbilicus levels. Cardiometabolic risk factors including serum triglycerides, HDL cholesterol levels, plasma glucose and blood pressure were defined using IDF 2005 criteria for metabolic syndrome. Results The cut‐points for VAT area at the umbilicus level were 111 cm 2 for men and 96 cm 2 for women to identify people with one or more cardiometabolic risk factors. For VAT area at the L2/3 level, the optimal cut‐points were 142 cm 2 for men and 115 cm 2 for women. A VAT area at the L2/3 level of ≥ 142 cm 2 for men or 115 cm 2 for women significantly increased the prevalence of hyperglycaemia [odds ratio ( OR ) 3.18, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) 2.45–4.13], hypertension ( OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.27–3.49) and dyslipidaemia ( OR 4.37, 95% CI 3.50–5.45) after adjusting age. Conclusions The optimal cut‐points for VAT area at the umbilicus level and L2/3 level were 111 cm 2 and 142 cm 2 for men and 96 cm 2 and 115 cm 2 for women to identify participants with one or more cardiometabolic risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huo et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic risk factors (n=1,744). Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area vs. Lower VAT area was evaluated on Hyperglycaemia (OR 3.18, 95% CI 2.45-4.13). Visceral adipose tissue area at the L2/3 level ≥142 cm2 for men or 115 cm2 for women significantly increased the odds of hyperglycaemia (OR 3.18; 95% CI 2.45-4.13).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: