PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 10, 2011European Respiratory Journal243 citationsOpen Access

Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnoea: mandibular advancement device therapy

MMMarie MarklundJVJohan VerbraeckenWRWinfried Randerath

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) represent the main non-continuous positive airway pressure (non-CPAP) therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim of the European Respiratory Society Task Force was to review the evidence in favour of MAD therapy. Effects of tongue-retaining devices are not included in this report. Custom-made MADs reduce apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) and daytime sleepiness compared with placebo devices. CPAP more effectively diminishes AHI, while increasing data suggest fairly similar outcomes in relation to symptoms and cardiovascular health from these treatments. Patients often prefer MADs to CPAP. Milder cases and patients with a proven increase in upper airway size as a result of mandibular advancement are most likely to experience treatment success with MADs. A custom-made device titrated from an initial 50% of maximum mandibular advancement has been recommended. More research is needed to define the patients who will benefit from MAD treatment compared with CPAP, in terms of the effects on sleep-disordered breathing and on other diseases related to OSA. In conclusion, MADs are recommended for patients with mild to moderate OSA (Recommendation Level A) and for those who do not tolerate CPAP. The treatment must be followed up and the device adjusted or exchanged in relation to the outcome.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marklund et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20aa0c989c291076fc1d8bhttps://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00144711
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Oral Appliance Therapy versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial2010 · 172 citations
  2. 2Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea2006 · 415 citations
  3. 3Comparison of two dental devices for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS)1997 · 125 citations
  4. 4Sexual Function and Obstructive Sleep Apnea–Hypopnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effects of Oral-Appliance and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy2006 · 97 citations
  5. 5Titrated mandibular advancement versus positive airway pressure for sleep apnoea2009 · 276 citations