Population-based cohort study shows increased COVID-19 risks for immigrants and refugees with mental health and addiction disorders, highlighting urgent support needs.
Abstract Background: While the COVID-19 pandemic has taken an enormous toll on communities across Canada and the globe, its negative impacts have not been experienced equally. People with mental health and addiction disorders (MH&A) have been found to be at greater risk of COVID-19 infection and worse COVID-19 outcomes. Similarly, although immigrants and refugees contribute to one-quarter of Ontario’s population they make up nearly half of Ontario’s COVID-19 cases. There is a paucity of information on the impact of COVID-19 on people who are at the intersection of MH&A and socioeconomic deprivation. Our study aimed to address this gap. Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study over a one-year period (January 15, 2020, to Feb 15, 2021) was conducted using multiple linked provincial-administrative databases. The study aimed to determine the differential impact of COVID-19 on immigrants and non-immigrants with MH& A and the general population without MH&A across sociodemographic and health-related factors like age, sex, neighbourhood income, Ontario marginalization index, comorbidities, and access to primary care. We used multivariable regression to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Our cohort comprised 10,994,464 Ontario residents aged 18 or older and of which approximately 17% lived with MH&A, with immigrants and refugees with MH&A making up 2.6%. People with preexisting MH&A were generally younger and more likely to live in deprived neighbourhoods compared to the general population. Immigrants and refugees with MH&A were more likely to reside in neighbourhoods with greater material deprivation, residential instability, and ethnic concentration compared to non-immigrants with MH&A. Even though the COVID-19 testing rate was lower among immigrants living with MH&A compared to non-immigrants with MH&A (32.7% vs. 37.6%), the confirmed positivity was significantly higher (12.4% vs. 4.5%). Adjusting for confounders we also found Covid 19 testing, hospital admission, intensive care admission, and mortality rates related to COVID-19 were considerably higher among people with MH&A than in the general population. Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence of the need to accelerate the development of targeted evidence-based policies that can effectively support and protect people living at the intersection of clinical and social inequities in this and future crises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vahabi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: