Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ex situ seed banks are presented as a major solution to the decline in agricultural crop diversity and the consequent threats to food security. As the current organization of human-crop relations fuels global warming, biodiversity loss and other environmental problems, this paper explores the logic of its legitimization through a critical reading of textual material concerning the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, a “backup” facility for the world’s crop diversity. Building on Anna Tsing’s use of translation, the paper demonstrates how seeds become assets in the SGSV’s practices. The paper draws on feminist/posthumanist research on human-plant relations and suggests that the SGSV’s strategy relies on translating diverse ways of human-crop life into a “one-size-fits-all” model which capitalizes on interspecies bonds. By making visible inequalities produced in the process, the paper argues for a need to (re)consider existing conservation arrangements, to obstruct environmental devastation and to make conservation more purposeful and just.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annukka Paajanen (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: