Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Attunement has been widely discussed across the post- and environmental humanities. However, might its common conflation with attention inadvertently reiterate humanist norms? This article explores three different artistic approaches to attunement — that of Philip Samartzis, AM Kanngieser, and Jenna Sutela — to elaborate differences between attentional and attunement modes of sensory relation. Attention is often understood as a kind of filter or interface for consciousness, preventing the external world from overwhelming the mind, or as a kind spotlight, cast outwards from internal consciousness. Both models reinstate the humanist notion that ‘the perceiver and the object of perception are discrete entities’ (Chiew, 2017: 48). Recent scholarship on attunement has been helpful in underscoring sensation’s situatedness, reciprocity and relationality. Yet its close association with attention means it inadvertently falls back on notions of mind/world, sensor/sensed, and cause/effect. How might attunement be otherwise understood as a non-subjective epistemological event in situ?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siobhan Leddy (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: