Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We believe that replicating studies in ecology and evolution is extremely valuable, but replication within species and systems is troublingly rare, and even 'quasi-replications' in different systems are often insufficient. We make a case for supporting multiple types of replications and point out that the current incentive structure needs to change if ecologists and evolutionary biologist are to value scientific replication sufficiently.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakagawa et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: