Key result
This review highlights recent advances and ACC/AHA guideline recommendations for the use of novel antithrombotic agents in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes.
This review outlines the evolving understanding of atherothrombosis in ACS and summarizes updated ACC/AHA guideline recommendations for the use of novel antithrombotic agents.
Our understanding of the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including acute ST elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) myocardial infarction, has evolved considerably over the years, with atherothrombosis playing a pivotal role. This review will discuss the recent advances/recommendations for drug therapy based on this enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology of thrombosis. More recently developed agents, such as low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa inhibitors, direct thrombin inhibitors, Factor Xa inhibitors and thienopyridines, offer several potential advantages, either as an alternative to unfractionated heparin (i.e., LMWHs) or as an add-on therapy to aspirin and unfractionated heparin (or LMWHs; e.g., GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors, thienopyridines). The purpose of this review is to describe recent studies with novel antithrombotic agents (e.g., LMWHs, thienopyridines, GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors, bivalirudin) in patients with NSTE ACS, as well as to highlight recommendations for management of patients with NSTE ACS in the recently updated American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, including the appropriate use of antithrombotic therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerard X. Brogan (2003) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Antithrombotic therapies (e.g., LMWHs, thienopyridines, GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors, bivalirudin) was evaluated. This review highlights recent advances and ACC/AHA guideline recommendations for the use of novel antithrombotic agents in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: