Key result
Septum short-axis MRI protocol improves RVEF reproducibility, yielding ~8% inter-observer variability.
Why the study?
Does the Septum short-axis cine acquisition protocol improve the reproducibility of ventricular function measurements in healthy volunteers compared to other orientations?
Cross-Sectional (n=20)
No
Does the Septum short-axis cine acquisition protocol improve the reproducibility of ventricular function measurements in healthy volunteers compared to other orientations?
Planning short-axis CMR slices perpendicular to the septum improves the reproducibility of right ventricular function measurements without compromising left ventricular assessment.
May support septum short-axis cine to lower RV EF variability in volunteers; hypothesis-generating, should not yet change practice.
PURPOSE: To define the optimal cardiac short-axis cine acquisition protocol for the assessment of the left and rightventricular functions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 volunteers were recruited and breath-hold CINE images were acquired on a Siemens Prisma 3T MRI. Four short-axis acquisition planes were defined from the 4-chamber view. AV Junctions: short-axis slices parallel to the plane that cuts through the external right and left atrioventricular junctions. Left AV Junctions: short-axis slices parallel to the plane that cuts through both left atrioventricular junctions. Septum: short-axis slices perpendicular to the septum with one cutting through the septum junction. LongAxis: short-axis slices perpendicular to the long axis with one cutting through the septum junction. Intra and inter reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman coefficient of variation (CV) and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The influence of the protocol on the ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) was quantified statistically using pair-wise CV and Pearson's correlation coefficient R (2). RESULTS: All protocols led to high reproducibility for the LV EF (mean intra CV = 3.83%, mean inter CV = 4.81%, lowest CV = 4.20% (AV junctions) and highest CV = 5.24% (Left AV Junctions)). Reproducibility of the RV measurements was lower (mean intra CV = 7.84%, mean inter CV = 9.17%). Septum protocol led to significantly lower variability compared to the other 3 protocols for RV EF (CV = 7.62% (Septum), CV = 8.42% (Long Axis), CV = 9.54% (Left AV Junctions) and CV = 11.08% (AV Junctions) with Lin's CCC varying from 0.4 (AV Junctions) to 0.69 (Septum) for inter-observer reproducibility). No differences in group average for clinical parameters was found for both LV and RV clinical measurements. However, patient-specific RV EF evaluation is dependent on the chosen protocol (CV = 9.95%, R (2) = 0.52). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the study cine mode short-axis acquisitions should be planned perpendicular to the septum in order to guarantee optimal RV and LV measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marchesseau et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy volunteers (n=20). Septum short-axis cine MRI protocol vs. AV Junctions, Left AV Junctions, and Long Axis protocols was evaluated on Inter-observer reproducibility (Coefficient of Variation) for Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction. The Septum short-axis acquisition protocol resulted in significantly lower inter-observer variability for right ventricular ejection fraction (CV 7.62%) compared to the other orientations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: