Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
patterns) stimuli under long and short presentation durations. Attractive stimuli produced strong activa-tions of the M. zygomaticus major muscle, indicating positive affective reactions; and unattractive stimuli produced strong activations of the M. corrugator supercili muscle, indicating negative affective reac-tions. Fluency effects, indicated by stronger activations of the M. zygomaticus major under the longer presentation duration were, however, only found for the abstract patterns. Moreover, the abstract patterns also were associated with more consistent activations over time than the faces, suggesting differences in the processes underlying the evaluation of faces and patterns. We discuss these results in terms of differences in appraisal processes between the two classes of stimuli—the greater biological, social, and sociosexual significance of faces trigger more complex appraisals than the abstract patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerger et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: