Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 19, 1997BMJOpen Access

Inpatient deaths from acute myocardial infarction, 1982-92: analysis of data in the Nottingham heart attack register

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Did inpatient mortality from acute myocardial infarction change between 1982 and 1992 with the increasing uptake of evidence-based treatments?

Population

Patients admitted with a confirmed acute myocardial infarction during 1982-1984 and 1989-1992 to two…

Comparison

Temporal trends in management vs Historical comparison (1982-1984 vs. 1989-1992)

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

Inpatient stay

Authors

NBNigel BrownRoyal Gwent HospitalTYTracey YoungUniversity of SheffieldDGDavid GrayUniversity of Nottingham

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Inpatient AMI mortality remained stable despite rising evidence-based therapy use; leaves open real-world implementation gaps or population differences versus trials.

Structured PICO

Did inpatient mortality from acute myocardial infarction change between 1982 and 1992 with the increasing uptake of evidence-based treatments?

P
Population
Patients admitted with a confirmed acute myocardial infarction during 1982-1984 and 1989-1992 to two district general hospitals serving an urban and rural population.
I
Intervention
Temporal trends in management (increased use of beta-blockers, aspirin, and thrombolysis)
C
Comparator
Historical comparison (1982-1984 vs. 1989-1992)
O
Outcome
Inpatient mortalityhard clinical

Despite the increased adoption of evidence-based therapies such as aspirin, beta-blockers, and thrombolysis between 1982 and 1992, inpatient mortality for acute myocardial infarction did not significantly change in this unselected population.

Cite This Study

Brown et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20af396d983757aaf9e220https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7101.159
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share