Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To determine whether elastic or non-elastic bandaging is more effective in healing chronic venous ulcers. Design: Randomized trial with factorial design and interaction analysis, enabling independent evaluation of both bandaging and dressings within the single-trial format. The duration of treatment was 12 weeks or until ulcer-healing, whichever occurred sooner. Setting: The Leg Ulcer Clinics of Edinburgh and Falkirk and District Royal Infirmaries, Scotland. Patients: 132 patients with chronic leg ulcers and clinical evidence of chronic venous disease, and excluding those with Doppler ultrasound ankle/brachial pressure indices of less than 0.8, diabetes or rheumatoid disease. There were 28 withdrawals who were classified for analysis as treatment failures. Interventions: Elastic or non-elastic multilayer bandage systems were applied using similar application techniques by a team of trained nurse specialists. All other treatments were standardized, including the randomization of dressings to either a knitted viscose or a hydrocellular polyurethane dressing. Main outcome measure: Complete ulcer healing. Results: In the elastic group 35 out of 65 ulcers (54%) healed within 12 weeks compared with 19 out of 67 (28%) in the non-elastic group (95% confidence limits for percentage healed, 9% to 42%). Ulcer pain was also reported significantly less often in the elastic group (48% of visits versus 29%; p=0.03). Conclusion: When applied by similar multilayer bandaging techniques, elastic bandaging was significantly better than non-elastic bandaging in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Callam et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: