Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Since Kano et al. (1984) Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F. and Tsuji, S. 1984. Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu, 14(2): 39–48. [Google Scholar] proposed the two-dimension quality model, it was widely accepted and applied. Yet there are still arguments raised, especially the identification method of its attribute. Later on some scholars proposed some corrective methods, but there were still some defaults in application. Therefore, the research proposed a new identification method for quality attribute to improve the accuracy of the identification. The method was not only easy to use, but also effective through difference comparison with traditional method by real cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: