Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines the theoretical and practical status of species relative to two major issues: the recognition of the importance of epigenetic constraints in evolution and the rise of Hennigian phylogenetic systematics (cladistics). Theories advanced to explain the origin and maintenance of basic morphological clusters of organisms (species) have usually involved two main classes of causal factors: selection (ecological constraints) and gene flow (breeding barriers vs. the integrating effect of gene exchange). However, in many plants non-correspondence of patterns of discontinuities among basic morphological, ecological, and breeding groups has been noted. The biological species is flawed because it is biased towards explanations at the genetic level. A third class of causal factors (epigenetic constraints) has come into favor as an explanation for the distinctness of higher-level morphological clusters, but the relevance of epigenetic factors as primary constraints on morphological variation at the species level remains to be examined. A phylogenetic species concept is advocated, which views species as monophyletic groups of organisms, the smallest such groups recognized in a formal classification. Assignment of species rank to a particular group should depend on the causal factors acting to maintain that group as an indepen- dent lineage. Epigenetic constraints may prove to be the most important factor producing and maintaining species lineages. Bryophytes are useful organisms for investigating this question be- cause they are readily manipulated under experimental conditions, both sexual and asexual species
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brent D. Mishler (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: