Key result
The matching pursuit algorithm provided comparable predictive validity to dynamic causal modeling for inferring tonic sympathetic arousal, while being 2-3 orders of magnitude faster.
The new matching pursuit algorithm provides a fast and reliable alternative to DCM inversion for analyzing spontaneous skin conductance fluctuations, significantly reducing computation time.
Tonic sympathetic arousal is often inferred from spontaneous fluctuations in skin conductance, and this relies on assumptions about the shape of these fluctuations and how they are generated. We have previously furnished a psychophysiological model for this relation, and an efficient and reliable inversion method to estimate tonic arousal from given data in the framework of dynamic causal modeling (DCM). Here, we provide a fast alternative inversion method in the form of a matching pursuit (MP) algorithm. Analyzing simulated data, this algorithm approximates the true underlying arousal up to about 10 spontaneous fluctuations per minute of data. For empirical data, we assess predictive validity as the ability to differentiate two known psychological arousal states. Predictive validity is comparable between the methods for three datasets, and also comparable to visual peak scoring. Computation time of the MP algorithm is 2-3 orders of magnitude faster for the MP than the DCM algorithm. In summary, the new MP algorithm provides a fast and reliable alternative to DCM inversion for SF data, in particular when the expected number of fluctuations is lower than 10 per minute, as in typical experimental situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bach et al. (2015) studied Psychological arousal states. Matching pursuit (MP) algorithm vs. Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) algorithm was evaluated on Predictive validity and computation time. The matching pursuit algorithm provided comparable predictive validity to dynamic causal modeling for inferring tonic sympathetic arousal, while being 2-3 orders of magnitude faster.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: