Key result
Planned RCT tests mHealth and peer counseling to lower SBP in hypertension and CAD.
Why the study?
Hypertension is a major public health challenge where digital interventions may improve medication adherence and alter health behavior, prompting this study to evaluate mHealth and educational peer counseling for blood pressure control compared to standard care.
Does mHealth and education-led peer counseling reduce systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=1,648)
Double-blind
Simple complete randomization
Yes
Does mHealth and education-led peer counseling reduce systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease?
This study protocol outlines a factorial randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of mHealth and peer counseling interventions for improving blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease in Pakistan.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a highly relevant public health challenge. Digital interventions may support improving adherence to anti-hypertensive medications and alter health behavior. Therefore, this protocol describes a study that aims to assess the effectiveness of mHealth and educational support through peer counseling (Ed-counselling) to control blood pressure in hypertensive patients when compared to standard care. METHODS: We chose a double-blinded pragmatic randomized-controlled with factorial design for this investigation. The trial is going to recruit 1648 hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease at the age of 21 to 70 years. All participants will already be on anti-hypertensive medication and own a smartphone. They will be randomized into four groups with each having 412 participants. The first group will only receive standard care; while the second group, in addition to standard care, will receive monthly Ed-counselling (educational booklets with animated infographics and peer counseling); the third group will receive daily written and voice reminders and an education-led video once weekly together with standard care; while the fourth one gets both interventions given to second and third groups respectively. All groups will be followed-up for 1 year (0, 6, and 12 months). The primary outcome will be the change in systolic blood pressure while secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life and changes in medication adherence. For measuring changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and adherence scores difference at 0, 6, and 12 months between and within the group, parametric (ANOVA/repeated measure ANOVA) and non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis test/Friedman test) will be used. By using the general estimating equation (GEE) with negative binomial regression, at 12 months, the covariates affecting primary and secondary outcomes will be determined and controlled. The analysis will be intention-to-treat. All the outcomes will be analyzed at 0, 6, and 12 months; however, the final analysis will be at 12 months from baseline. DISCUSSION: Besides adding up to existing evidence in the literature on the subject, our designed modules using mHealth technology can help in reducing hypertension-related morbidity and mortality in developing countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arshed et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Hypertension and coronary artery disease (n=1,648). mHealth and education-led peer counseling (factorial design) vs. Standard care was evaluated on Change in systolic blood pressure at 0, 6, and 12 months. mHealth and education-led peer counseling will be evaluated for their efficacy in reducing systolic blood pressure among 1,648 patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease in a planned randomized controlled trial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: