Key result
A standardized discharge process in a pediatric emergency department eliminated preventable discharge-related serious safety events and increased vital sign acquisition from 67% to 83%.
Why the study?
Preventable, discharge-related serious safety events highlighted vulnerabilities in emergency department discharge care.
Does a standardized discharge process improve discharge safety and reduce serious safety events in a pediatric emergency department?
Does a standardized discharge process improve discharge safety and reduce serious safety events in a pediatric emergency department?
Implementing a standardized discharge process in a pediatric emergency department eliminated reported discharge-related serious safety events without increasing length of stay or return visits.
Hypothesis-generating for pediatric ED discharge safety; prospective trials needed before practice change.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Discharge from the emergency department (ED) involves a complex series of steps to ensure a safe transition to home and follow-up care. Preventable, discharge-related serious safety events (SSEs) in our ED highlighted local vulnerabilities. We aimed to improve ED discharge by implementing a standardized discharge process with emphasis on multidisciplinary communication and family engagement. METHODS: At a tertiary children's hospital, we used the model for improvement to revise discharge care. Interventions included a new discharge checklist, a provider huddle emphasizing discharge vital signs, and a scripted discharge review of instructions with families. We used statistical process control to evaluate performance. Primary outcomes included elimination of preventable, discharge-related SSEs and Press Ganey survey results assessing caregiver information for care of child at home. A secondary outcome was number of days between preventable low-level (near-miss, no or minimal harm) events. Process measures included discharge checklist adoption and vital sign acquisition. Balancing measures were length of stay (LOS) and return rates. RESULTS: Over the study period, there were no preventable SSEs and low-level event frequency improved to a peak of >150 days between events. Press Ganey responses regarding quality of discharge information did not change (62%). Checklist use was rapidly adopted, reaching 94%. Vital sign acquisition increased from 67% to 83%. There was no change in the balancing measures of median LOS or return visit rates. CONCLUSIONS: The development and implementation of a standardized discharge process led to the elimination of reported discharge-related events, without increasing LOS or return visits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paydar‐Darian et al. (2022) studied Pediatric emergency department discharge. Standardized discharge process vs. Pre-intervention standard of care was evaluated on Elimination of preventable, discharge-related serious safety events (SSEs) and Press Ganey survey results assessing caregiver information. A standardized discharge process in a pediatric emergency department eliminated preventable discharge-related serious safety events and increased vital sign acquisition from 67% to 83%.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: