Key result
Exposure of J774 macrophages to linoleic, palmitic, and stearic acids increased LPL mRNA expression, while arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acids decreased it, potentially mediated by PPARs.
Why the study?
Do fatty acids directly regulate macrophage lipoprotein lipase expression in J774 murine macrophages?
Do fatty acids directly regulate macrophage lipoprotein lipase expression in J774 murine macrophages?
Fatty acids directly regulate macrophage lipoprotein lipase expression, potentially mediated by PPARs, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for fatty acid-PPAR effects on macrophage LPL in diabetic atherosclerosis; human studies needed before clinical relevance.
Atherosclerosis is a major complication of type 2 diabetes. The pathogenesis of this complication is poorly understood, but it clearly involves production in the vascular wall of macrophage (Mo) lipoprotein lipase (LPL). Mo LPL is increased in human diabetes. Peripheral factors dysregulated in diabetes, including glucose and free fatty acids (FAs), may contribute to this alteration. We previously reported that high glucose stimulates LPL production in both J774 murine and human Mo. In the present study, we evaluated the direct effect of FAs on murine Mo LPL expression and examined the involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in this effect. J774 Mo were cultured for 24 h with 0.2 mmol/l unsaturated FAs (arachidonic [AA], eicosapentaenoic [EPA], and linoleic acids [LA]) and monounsaturated (oleic acid [OA]) and saturated FAs (palmitic acid [PA] and stearic acid [SA]) bound to 2% bovine serum albumin. At the end of this incubation period, Mo LPL mRNA expression, immunoreactive mass, activity, and synthetic rate were measured. Incubation of J774 cells with LA, PA, and SA significantly increased Mo LPL mRNA expression. In contrast, exposure of these cells to AA and EPA dramatically decreased this parameter. All FAs, with the exception of EPA and OA, increased extra- and intracellular LPL immunoreactive mass and activity. Intracellular LPL mass and activity paralleled extracellular LPL mass and activity in all FA-treated cells. In Mo exposed to AA, LA, and PA, an increase in Mo LPL synthetic rate was observed. To evaluate the role of PPARs in the modulatory effect of FAs on Mo LPL gene expression, DNA binding assays were performed. Results of these experiments demonstrate an enhanced binding of nuclear proteins extracted from all FA-treated Mo to the peroxisome proliferator-response element (PPRE) consensus sequence of the LPL promoter. PA-, SA-, and OA-stimulated binding activity was effectively diminished by immunoprecipitation of the nuclear proteins with anti-PPAR-alpha antibodies. In contrast, anti-PPAR-gamma antibodies only significantly decreased AA-induced binding activity. Overall, these results provide the first evidence for a direct regulatory effect of FAs on Mo LPL and suggest a potential role of PPARs in the regulation of Mo LPL gene expression by FAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michaud et al. (2001) studied Atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes. Fatty acids (arachidonic, eicosapentaenoic, linoleic, oleic, palmitic, and stearic acids) was evaluated on Macrophage LPL mRNA expression, immunoreactive mass, activity, and synthetic rate. Exposure of J774 macrophages to linoleic, palmitic, and stearic acids increased LPL mRNA expression, while arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acids decreased it, potentially mediated by PPARs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: