Key result
Recurrent MI linked to ~2.3-fold higher odds of prehospital statin use versus primary MI.
Cross-Sectional (n=294)
No
Odds Ratio: 2.26 (95% CI 1.29–3.99)
Absolute Event Rate: 38.6% vs 21.8%
p-value: p=0.005
Statin utilization remains unacceptably low in real-world clinical practice for both primary and secondary prevention among patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction in a contemporary Russian cohort.
Low prehospital statin use signals prevention gaps in MI; leaves open whether targeted strategies improve uptake in real-world cohorts.
Relevance. Myocardial infarction (MI) remains one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. The high prevalence of this atherosclerosis-associated disease is undoubtedly associated with insufficient prevention of cardiovascular diseases, including due to insufficient use of statins. This article highlights the problem of evaluating the use of statins as a means of primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention using the example of myocardial infarction from a sample of patients in the Siberian region. Objective. To evaluate the frequency of statin use in patients before the onset of primary and recurrent type 1 myocardial infarction. Materials and methods. The open continuous cross-sectional study included 294 patients selected from the local registry of acute coronary syndrome, treated at the 1st cardiology department of the Novosibirsk State Clinical Hospital No. 1 in 2021–2023. A multifactorial logistic regression model was used to assess the effect of various factors on the use of statins at the prehospital stage. Results. It was found that in the subgroup of primary MI, the frequency of statin use was 21.8 %, and in the subgroup of repeated MI, the frequency was 38.6 %. An analysis of the factors associated with statin use revealed a statistically significant association with repeated myocardial infarction, OR 2.26 (1.29–3.99), and with dyslipidemia, OR 1.81 (1.02–3.25). Other factors: hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, obesity, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction, creatinine levels, age and gender. They have not reached the level of significance. The doses of the drugs corresponded to clinical recommendations; in 70 % of cases, atorvastatin was used, and in 30 %, rosuvastatin was used. Among the patients taking statins, many (more than 2/3 of the patients) did not reach the target values of LDL cholesterol. Conclusions. The present study demonstrates insufficient frequency, intensity and duration of statin therapy among patients hospitalized with primary and recurrent type 1 myocardial infarction, and this indicates a poor state of primary and secondary prevention of this preventable cardiovascular event.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ложкина et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute coronary syndrome (type 1 myocardial infarction) (n=294). Recurrent myocardial infarction vs. Primary myocardial infarction was evaluated on Prehospital statin use (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.29-3.99, p=0.005). Prehospital statin use was observed in only 21.8% of primary and 38.6% of recurrent myocardial infarction cases, with recurrent MI being significantly associated with a higher likelihood of statin use (OR 2.26).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: